A previous post asked "what happens when the court charged with determining the legality of warrantless searches for the purpose of intelligence agrees that the president has the right to order such searches after millions of people have invested themselves in the premise that such searches were immoral because they were illegal?"
If you are a Constitutional lawyer, like Glenn Greenwald, you read carefully and apply legal knowledge to the false claims of reporters who can't be bothered with little details like facts.
Showing posts with label rule of law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rule of law. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Thursday, January 15, 2009
The rule of law
So what happens when the court charged with determining the legality of warrantless searches for the purpose of intelligence agrees that the president has the right to order such searches after millions of people have invested themselves in the premise that such searches were immoral because they were illegal?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
